I expected a similar response to come.
As much as i would like to spend my entire day on the site I can't. You cannot simply read a post and qualify it to be a derailement, low-effort, insulting, racist post in and out of itself.
I need to take under account the context of everything, the thread, the responses, The culture of this image board etc, it's also different everywhere 4chan is different than 8chan is different than arisuchan, comparing them is like comparing oranges and apple both are fruit yet their different.
What you are suggesting, is for me to take action in an subjective way of qualifying post being "worthy" of a thread.
People would complain to the contrary that I'm to much restrictive and this will not help nurture the discussion that Arisuchan wish to spark from it's user base, yet your right that being to much "Open" will also bring a lot of problem.
The middle ground is what I'm searching for without censoring, restricting any thread and user. It's not an easy task. I could add it's an extremely exhausting way of moderating because like right now I have to take up to two hour to answer your simple yet deep question instead of reading other post.
Moderator aren't the people making the rules, we're the one who applying them. If you believe our rules need more specification, create another thread and asked our admin and community to expend our rules.
Or you can apply to becoming a mod too.
I am human which mean im not perfect, but if i were to moderate in a subjective manner anyone insulting me would be ban, people questioning my ways like right now, ban. Political post I would consider racist, stupid etc ban.
I don't want to be this kinda of mod because what i "Consider" isn't what everyone consider. Yet what i take out of your post is i could be more strict sometime, and i agree.