/z/ - GPL is revocable, Discuss on G

GPL is revocable, Discuss on G Undisclosed 2019/04/26 (Fri) 10:50:06 No.473

Cereal Killer 2019/04/27 (Sat) 20:13:40 No.477

Get fucked Mikee

Undisclosed 2019/06/03 (Mon) 00:27:29 No.543

>>477
Be more specific.

And how do you know I'm this """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'"Mikee"""""""""

Eric S. Raymond: [GPL]"revokists" have it right. Prof. Hodgeson 2019/06/03 (Mon) 00:29:14 No.544

http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=8317#comment-2238862 (Archive link: http://archive.fo/emkVd )
A commentator asked on Eric S. Raymond's website:

>ESR: Eben Moglen suggested that he was going to write a paper refuting the notion that "The GPL is revocable":
>
>>I think the best procedure would be for me to publish my analysis and
>>for you then to tell me what is wrong with it.
>https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/26/718
>
>Why has no such paper from him materialized?

ESR response was shocking, blunt, and to the point:
>esr on 2019-05-30 at 08:08:23 said:
>
>>Why has no such paper from him materialized?
>
>Because Moglen is either wrong about or deliberately misrepresenting the law and the "revokists" have it right. Thank you, I had already figured this out from his (non)responses on lkml.

https://slashdot.org/submission/9760958/esr-revokists-have-it-right

https://slashdot.org/submission/9770756/eric-s-raymond-gplrevokists-have-it-right