No.2440
Matrix? XMPP?
No.2441
>>2440im genuinely too retarded to set up an xmpp server, but matrix might work
No.2442
>>2441scratch that, matrix client seem really "not fluid" is the best way i can put it
No.2443
Tech illiterates are a security anf privacy risk.
No.2448
Mumble for voice, irc/xmpp/tox for text. Keep tabs on Matrix, it has the potential to do this all. Maybe try convincing them to use riot.im (matrix client)?
No.2491
There are very few good solutions if you are looking for ease of access, and I doubt that anyone around you is willing to host their own XMPP / Mumble or find secure hosts for it.
I'd say the easiest solution to the basic user is Signal for the desktop / mobile.
No.2492
>>2491Signal is nothing without a secure host, just throwing the information out there in case people would think they are protected against everything simply using Signal.
No.2497
>>2442matrix is an open spec, you don't need to use the riot client
https://github.com/mujx/nheko No.2504
>>2492Of course, and I don't believe Android nor any mobile phone to be a good host for secure communication, it's still better than plain text
No.2507
Matrix protocol with Riot as desktop client is definitely the closest you will get to discord, except for group voice chat. If you are gonna try it out, do use Riot, as it's the only client that supports encryption AFAIK.
No.2521
Hi! Use ffmpeg + irc on linux. No servers no spy. Have a good day
No.2523
>>2521How do you use ffmpeg for this?
OP you can also check out Jitsi Meet but it's more of a Google Hangouts alternative:
https://jitsi.org/jitsi-meet/ No.4072
>>2492One step at a time, and check your threat model. Protecting information in transit, and zero knowledge provider is still useful even if shazzbots have poor endpoint security - it prevents mass surveillance and requires targeted attacks. Not everyones threat model includes targeted attacks. But even if it did, There is a network effect for comms that is useful to leverage.
