No.1035
>tor can work
well, its conceivable that an ISP could, if they opt to say, throttle net contacts to their competition, probably scan for Tor packets and throttle them. Will they? we shall see, lets hope not, but thats on them if this goes through, not us.
We shall see…
gosh this world.
No.1036
just let the pages load more slowly and console yourself with the fact that the internet will be less comfortable for the people who ruined it. Oh, sure, facebook and netflix will be fast, but the free pornography sites will not be
Plus, bandwith and data caps could bring back text boards! That would be fun
No.1037
Im happy, this means that the US will stagnate in the digital market and give room for other countries to take place.
No.1039
The death of net neutrality is worse than the death of the internet, it's the death of the physical infrastructure in place that supports it. When net neutrality dies I'd like to say I'd just leave the clearnet/internet and try to find a mesh net or some other network, but the tcp/ip packets to and from those networks would be on the infrastructure that these corporations would be controlling.
The death of net neutrality might actually be the death of me, which is kinda pathetic.
No.1043
>>1039stop being so self-centered. Its the death of american net neutrality. And no, other countries wont be inspired to follow your lead when you do stupid soykaf. No country took up allowing creationism in school just because the US did it.
No.1045
>>1043This.
Boo hoo, the burgers can't watch le netflicks at high res or get a decent ping in online gaming. Corporations will just set up elsewhere so this is a good way to decentralize these major services on a global scale.
The rest of the world doesn't need the burgernet anyways. We'll just build infrastructure to route around it. No biggie.
The first call to arms for this net neutrality thing drew attention but now it's seems like just crying wolf while keeping a small group of people employed.
No.1047
>>1043My argument would be that China and SEA are still even with all the restrictions placed upon their internet, a thriving lawless community of free speech/hacking on the wire.
If they can do it under 10x the restrictions, so can we. We just have to get good.
No.1056
>>1047>We just have to get good.DING DING DING WE HAVE A WINNER
Cyberpunk is now. Git gud or get rekt.
No.1058
>>1033>Tor can work right?There are plenty of other networks (i2p, freenet, even some telnet or ssh bbs' such as einchan) that could be utilized. If all else fails, try to find a local intranet or meshnet. I recommend the following for more information on meshnets:
https://www.reddit.com/r/darknetplan/https://www.reddit.com/r/Meshnet/https://hyperboria.net/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=49CrjksXF54https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=luvthTjC0OIhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pSSiqlwzA3U No.1059
I live on Tor. It seems a lot of sites are allowing Tor posting nowadays and speeds are faster than ever.
No.1063
>>1059>speeds [on Tor] are faster than ever.say what you will about the NSA, at least they don't skimp on the exit node bandwidth
No.1082
https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/6cvg82/comcast_is_trying_to_censor_our_pronet_neutrality/Seems like there is some "astroturfing" going on lol.
The FFTF points fingers at Comcast but cannot prove it.
Either it's a shady move by a megacorp or a self-inflicted publicity stunt because nobody gives a soykaf this time around. I didn't know they actually care about what's in the message as I believe they did a copypasta last time and it worked… (click here to fill in your info and send this canned letter to the FCC etc)
No.1087
>>1082Someone recently did an analysis on the FCC, unveiling quite the scandal leading to further investigation by the Guardian and the Washington Post.
https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/6odans/fcc_now_says_there_is_no_documented_analysis_of/dkgxguo/ No.1127
No.1128
OP, do you understand what is net neutrality and what are regulations on it?
Net neutrality is untampered internet connection, at full speed, namely to ISP's backbone or local exchange point as advised in your connection plan or whatever is according to your local laws.
Lack of net neutrality can be anything. It can be a form of form of Internet censorship, domain, ip, protocol blocking, traffic shaping, download/upload limits, or "data caps" in burger newspeak.
So, which one will your ISP will implement? I do not fucking know. It can be a combination of many, something like unlimited access to Netflix with 1 terabyte of data on everything else, like in good ol' days of Usenet and modem connections. It could be bandwidth restrictions or per-hour pay, I do not fucking know.
As per Tor. you are trying to compare soft with warm. Your ISP might limit bandwidth on everything that is not Amazon and Netflix, or block all (public) Tor entry nodes and mirrors, or Tor traffic (not obfucscated), or shape everything that is not TLS/SSL connecting to good goy domains and so on, and so on.
Then (only in this particular situation only) your choice would be to connect through amazon-meek bridge, just because Amazon and it's ddos cloud protection IP swarm are tor-friendly.
No.1130
>>1033your worst problem with internet is these soykafty monopoly positions where your ISPs put themselves through lobbying and nothing about that whole controversy will do anything about that spit
you're always dramatic about the most inane bullbit I fugging hate americans nuke yourselves already you ruined my week
No.1142
OP, it's like
>>1128 said; you may see some special package deals that offer benefits for certain commercial web traffic such as Netflix or Spotify, but at the end of the day nobody is going to be fuarking too hard with your internet connection; the reason being they still want/need your money.
And besides, we're already capable of routing around entire fucking nation states meddling if we need to, how's this going to be any different?
Git gud, or get rekt.
