arisuchan    [ tech / cult / art ]   [ λ / Δ ]   [ psy ]   [ ru ]   [ random ]   [ meta ]   [ all ]    info / stickers     temporarily disabledtemporarily disabled

/q/ - arisuchan meta

discuss arisuchan itself. comments and questions welcome.
Name
Email
Subject
Comment

formatting options

File
Password (For file deletion.)

Help me fix this shit. https://legacy.arisuchan.jp/q/res/2703.html#2703

Kalyx ######


File: 1520594919409.jpg (2.93 MB, 2880x1800, 1388039567888.jpg)

 No.1816

Hello, new user here. I made a reply on /psy/ and I could have sworn it showed up, but now it's not there. Was it deleted or am I missing something from the FAQ? I see that there's emphasis on post quality, but from what I remember it was neither the shortest, the least informative, nor the most pointless post in the thread.

 No.1817

File: 1520613254108.png (17.27 KB, 336x330, 105gs1i.png)

Huh, found it on /all/ afterwards but figured I'd wait, now it's appearing on /psy/

Okay then.

 No.1818

>>1817
Sometimes you just need to force the refresh, it happens.

 No.1824

>>1818
Don't force it. Just let it happen.

 No.1848

Similar question; wasn't there an eBook Reader thread around? I can't seem to find it.

 No.1849

>>1848
Is this the one you are looking for?
>>>/cult/1137

 No.1853

>>1849
Yes! Thank you.
That thread should clearly be in /tech/. It's specifically about eBook Readers: the technology.

 No.1854

>>1849
Did a mod goddamn delete the thread? It's neither on /cult/ nor /tech/ now what's going on

 No.1855

Why did a mod delete the fucking eBook Reader thread? It had months of content and was just about to go somewhere new.

 No.1856

Excuse me, a bug(?) made the thread appear all the way down at page SIX on /tech/ after the move, which I of course did not expect to be the case.
Sorry and a 'heads up', because if this indeed is a bug and it works like this generally it must've killed some threads in the past by acting like this.

 No.1857

>>1855
>Why did a mod delete the fucking eBook Reader thread?
It wasn't deleted. It was moved to >>>/tech/1769. We don't do shadow topics.

>>1856
>Sorry and a 'heads up', because if this indeed is a bug and it works like this generally it must've killed some threads in the past by acting like this.
That definitely sounds like a bug. We could use some help with board development, honestly.

 No.1859

>>1857
Annoying the ereader thread was never meant to be about ereaders,

Content was the deal.

 No.1860

>>1859

Someone propose to collectively found idea to make ereader more "free software" in a /tech/ board. IF the intentions of the OP was only share book /cult/ was a better board. In that regard i believe discussing the ereader capability to become more free was in the right board and right thread.



[Return] [Go to top] [ Catalog ] [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]