No.1818
>>1817Sometimes you just need to force the refresh, it happens.
No.1824
>>1818Don't force it. Just let it happen.
No.1848
Similar question; wasn't there an eBook Reader thread around? I can't seem to find it.
No.1849
>>1848Is this the one you are looking for?
>>>/cult/1137 No.1853
>>1849Yes! Thank you.
That thread should clearly be in /tech/. It's specifically about eBook Readers: the technology.
No.1854
>>1849Did a mod goddamn delete the thread? It's neither on /cult/ nor /tech/ now what's going on
No.1855
Why did a mod delete the fucking eBook Reader thread? It had months of content and was just about to go somewhere new.
No.1856
Excuse me, a bug(?) made the thread appear all the way down at page SIX on /tech/ after the move, which I of course did not expect to be the case.
Sorry and a 'heads up', because if this indeed is a bug and it works like this generally it must've killed some threads in the past by acting like this.
No.1857
>>1855>Why did a mod delete the fucking eBook Reader thread?It wasn't deleted. It was moved to
>>>/tech/1769. We don't do shadow topics.
>>1856>Sorry and a 'heads up', because if this indeed is a bug and it works like this generally it must've killed some threads in the past by acting like this.That definitely sounds like a bug. We could use some help with board development, honestly.
No.1859
>>1857Annoying the ereader thread was never meant to be about ereaders,
Content was the deal.
No.1860
>>1859Someone propose to collectively found idea to make ereader more "free software" in a /tech/ board. IF the intentions of the OP was only share book /cult/ was a better board. In that regard i believe discussing the ereader capability to become more free was in the right board and right thread.