/q/ - arisuchan meta

>>1599
>why does arisuchan delete political threads that are not in line with anarchism/communism?
Because we don't? Neither superadministrator is an anarchist or communist so your accusation doesn't even make sense. You're just trying to start soykaf and failed.

then where'd my thread go? It had multiple replies. Apparently politics isn't allowed, it wasn't moved, just deleted.

>>1602
What was the subject? What board?

Serious question. None of the mods that are on have deleted anything in the last week.

If I don't hear back from you, I'll figure out what happened when the others wake up.

We do not censor political posts (and I'm nowhere near ancom personally) but we'll delete low-effort threads. Not sure what happened, but if you want to talk about politics, please post in /z/. /z/ could really use some good political threads.

>>1605
>/z/ could really use some good political threads.
I wrote a list of suggested threads for /z/ at >>>/z/39

>>1599

>We don't censor ideas; we delete low-quality posts. Well-articulated arguments and a little bit of effort go a long way.

I'll delete anything that doesn't follow these guidelines. I don't know what thread was deleted, but a lot of posts, mostly on /z/, have been removed because they don't even come close to follow this rule. Personal attacks and namecalling aren't discussion, you can have threads about politics but they're going to be held to the same standard as everything else on the website.

To clarify, this comes from all political alignments, looking through what I've deleted, at least recently, nobody is an a position to claim the moral high ground. Libertarians, authoritarians, capitalists, socialists, communists, everyone has broken these rules and had posts deleted. Part of it is the subject matter, I get that people have very strong opinions on politics, probably moreso than most of the other content on the board, but if you can't take a step back and clearly express your opinion, and actually engage in discussion, it's not going to be left on the website.

It's hard to remember what board I even made it on, considering none of the boards have any space for political discussion, it was about big government vs small government.
I wouldn't say it was low effort since I was trying to start a real discussion.

>>1610
If it was the "programmers can't be anarchists lmao" thread you should be happy you wasn't derezzed, it's against the rules to post here if you are under 18.

>>1612
That was a point I made.
Thanks for your opinion, now I know to avoid this website when I want discussion.

>>1622
Indeed keep your retarded question (which wasn't even one) to yourself.

And read the fucking guideline for this reasons

>Please make intelligent posts.

We don't censor ideas; we delete low-quality posts. Well-articulated arguments and a little bit of effort go a long way.

because your ideology is incapable of high quality posts

>>1601
> Neither superadministrator is an anarchist or communist so your accusation doesn't even make sense.

Let me translate some from the alt-right lexicon for you. Anyone that disagrees with them is a communist (unless of course they're a muslim). I'm only slightly exaggerating here… it's like when liberals used to call GW Bush and anyone who voted for him a "nazi" only now the polarity has flipped.