arisuchan    [ tech / cult / art ]   [ λ / Δ ]   [ psy ]   [ ru ]   [ random ]   [ meta ]   [ all ]    info / stickers     temporarily disabledtemporarily disabled

/λ/ - programming

structure and interpretation of computer programs.
Name
Email
Subject
Comment

formatting options

File
Password (For file deletion.)

Help me fix this shit. https://legacy.arisuchan.jp/q/res/2703.html#2703

Kalyx ######


File: 1528077491111.jpg (60.67 KB, 1280x720, steinsgate-screenshot-1.jpg)

 No.1161

So, who here already experimented in programming for (theoretical) Quantum Computers?
As a good start there are 2 quite common and longer existing languages with compilers
- QCL: http://tph.tuwien.ac.at/~oemer/qcl.html
- QML: https://web.archive.org/web/20171101170712/http://sneezy.cs.nott.ac.uk/QML/
- IBM Q Experience (though not directly a real language): https://quantumexperience.ng.bluemix.net/qx/experience

A small but quite nice how to written by some people:
https://cryptoanarchy.freed0m4all.net/wiki/Quantum_computer

Sadly there isn't that much practical stuff on the net to get started. So experimenting oneself is a must. Hope there are some interested people here to further explore the possibilities.

 No.1193

Wow, this is actually really, really interesting. It'd be nice if we could get a little community of individuals together to make some resources and documentation on stuff like this. I had no idea it existed.

 No.1204

>>1193
Sure, but first we can start here.

Other news:
I noticed today that after some library upgrades on my Gentoo box, qcl stopped working so i had to recompile. While
make
started to link everything it failed with a message to recompile with a parameter, you have to put this parameter which i forgot already in the
DEBUG="..."
variable of the Makefile. Then
make clean
, then
make
and it will work again.

 No.1206

>>1161
A clearing in a forest of repetition and echo. Thank you for this post. We definitely need a place to discuss alternative computing seeing as Moore's Law is dead and transistor based computer hardware is proving to be completely unsafe.

 No.1265


 No.1269

>Sadly there isn't that much practical stuff on the net to get started.
it was my understanding that there isn't much practical stuff in general.
the only practical things i've heard of have been adiabatic.
is there any else?

 No.1276

>>1269
Well, with "practical" it was meant as more example / "practical" code for the already existing (theoretical) languages. In QCL there are some examples included, but it's not that funky and more like very light PoC.

 No.1288

Q# by Microsoft:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/quantum/development-kit
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q_Sharp

Haven't tried this one yet, but looks quite far functional.

 No.1308

Found this talk. Despite a few flaws, I think he really nails it when it comes to communicating the right world-view or perspective one must develop to git gud at quantum computing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y2K82EVGxaI

 No.1309

File: 1533448298329.jpg (142.06 KB, 1064x1047, lain.jpg)

To continue the discussion, anyone else notice that the big players have all within the last year or so entered the quantum gamble? All announcing some level of commitment to quantum as a part of their long-term strategy for the next 10 years? Some starting to roll out SDKs to grow public interest and develop an ecosystem.

What did they all know that the rest of us didn't? My hunch was that they knew quantum computing would become a mainstream technology. Was recently confirmed with some announcements these past couple of weeks. Bismuth-antimony (BiSb) thin-films are ideal topological insulators, that exhibit the quantum hall effect at room temperature, and are on track first for new applications with new memory tech. Topological quantum computing is the approach Microsoft is most focused on, as it has certain properties that make it really good at error correction with far less resources.

https://www.titech.ac.jp/english/news/2018/042001.html

If you're familiar with the memory process roadmap, next 4-5 years brings us to HBM4 with photonic interconnects yielding speeds of 4TB/s and max capacity of 1024GB per CPU socket. That should be enough time for BiSb to mature in the lab and the fab. Combine it with the 3D stacking used for HBM and we're looking some serious soykaf. Recall Alan Kay's ominous "the real computer revolution hasn't started yet" line.

 No.1484

I had a mediocre undergrad computer science experience . How can I learn more about quantum? I was really interested in ternary computers like Setun in undergrad and have heard of similar system being proposed for quantum.

I'd be interested in learning how to program for one. One makes them different to program for? Why do they require new languages ?

Also , how does DNA computing compare with Quantum computing for those who know? I guess that's Quantum 's "competitor".

 No.1487

qc isn't going to be feasible until the late 2040's at best. we ain't there yet chief. if you want to get a head start, you think you'll live that long, and you're already a phd genius in nonlinear particle physics then still your best bet is to learn depth psychology and to master a transverse wind instrument (think about it)

that said i believe in a future generation where the kids pick up qc the same way we learned email. we will be the gramps. i don't think anyone alive today that isn't a specialist is going to make any use in qc.

however if you want to get ahead of the curve start researching molecule computing, specifically with graphene. many layers of ultrathin chips are going to start reproducing the synapses in cat brains by 2035, then humans shortly after, then all bets are off. risc-v will probably be the last silicon chip people use.

 No.1488

>>1487
I went to a talk on an active quantum computer researcher and they compared their efforts to barely Babbage level

I want to learn ahead of the curve technology . I hardly hear about any up and coming technologies aside from AI and crypto related stuff

 No.1490

>>1487
I think the military are going to be using this technology much, much earlier than that. There's no reason for them not to.

 No.1491

>>1490
As soon as people believe quantum attacks are realistic they're going to jump to post-quantum cryptography. Do you see military applications that aren't a few years of cryptanalysis?

 No.1521

Wews I am really interested but there are too many stuffs I dont seem to know when I tried to read those papers, those mathematical statements had many symbols I never show earlier, so I need to put some more time on more basic stuffs before I get back to these



[Return] [Go to top] [ Catalog ] [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]